REVIEW: Staff Development: A Practical Guide, 3rd edition |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Nationally, public libraries spend $16.96 per capita for total staff expenditures, and this averages more than 64% of all operating expenditures. This makes library personnel a very valuable resource. One important component in the growth and development of quality library service is the caliber of the personnel. A new building, healthy funding, and supportive board members are all important factors, but none of these can be effective without qualified, motivated, and (ideally) passionate personnel to provide services and programs, and to interact with the community. |
|||||||||||||||
REVIEW: An Action Plan for Outcomes Assessment in Your Library |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
It is almost impossible for anyone in the library world to be unaware of the growing use of outcome-based evaluation techniques for assessing program effectiveness. The Institute of Museum and Library Services requires outcomes reports from grantees. The Library Commission also requires outcome-based evaluation for grants awarded. So, this book addresses a timely need, assisting staff responsible for developing and providing library programs in measuring and reporting outcomes. Hernon and Dugan provide background on the different ways that standards and assessment function in different library settings, and how these methods have changed over time. Assessment is described as what occurs when an institution or organization examines and evaluates it own programs. Accountability is described as the assessment of an organization’s performance by an outside entity. The authors assert that accountability is integral to an institution’s effectiveness. This book contains practical examples and an implementation plan that uses common sense to demystify the buzzwords. It stresses the importance of measuring outcomes in the maintenance of accreditation and funding levels, ensuring improved programs and services that are responsive to local needs. As one source is quoted, “…the role of evaluation is ‘not to prove, but to improve.’” (p. 62) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Go to page:Previous 3 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | next 4 |